Speedy vs TrackMax+ / Meal Ticket
The rebate system UniPro chose for the AI era.
UniPro Foodservice, the largest buying group in US foodservice distribution, chose Speedy to run its rebate workflows.
We ingest your TrackMax+ daily file. No reformatting.
Evaluated. Chosen. Live.
The evaluation
UniPro ran a competitive evaluation for the rebate platform its network would depend on.
The decision
It chose Speedy to run rebate calculation and program tracking across its network.
The result
Rebate workflows live and running alongside the systems members already use.
Stop reporting the past. Chase the next best opportunity.
A report tells you what you earned. The Opportunities view tells you what is within reach: every program sorted by how close you are to the next rebate band and what hitting it is worth, while there is still time in the quarter to act.
| Supplier | Program | Progress to next band | Current band | Next band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeshore Provisions | Volume 2 | 94% | $341,275 | $450,000 |
| Summit Foods | Growth Q3 | 98% | $0 | $1,125,000 |
| Bluewater Seafood | UPA-1 PC (SPA) | 99% | $1,784,909 | $1,950,000 |
| Prairie Gold Mills | UPA-2 CU (SPA) | 93% | $2,804,556 | $3,300,000 |
| Harvest Ridge Farms | Volume 1 | 77% | $61,791 | $100,000 |
Illustrative data. In the walkthrough, this view runs on a demo modeled on your business from your public catalog.
An account at 94% of its next tier with weeks left in the quarter is not a report line, it is a sales call. Speedy surfaces those moments across your whole book and can alert your team before the window closes.
Turn rebate knowledge into AI-native workflows
Program logic should not live in spreadsheets, inboxes, or one analyst's head. Speedy turns conditions, exceptions, and approvals into reusable workflows that your team builds.
1 · Pick any variable
Build rules on your own data
Every field in the system is a dropdown away. Set conditions, choose an action, and apply it across thousands of records at once.
Conditions
Actions
2 · Or just say it
Describe it in plain English
Skip the dropdowns entirely. Describe the condition the way you would to a colleague, and the AI builds it for you.
Conditions generated
3 · Stack them
Rules become workflows
Saved rules chain into workflows that encode how your operation runs, and then run it, on every sync, forever.
Runs on every sync, no IT ticket
This engine is at the core of how UniPro Foodservice operates its rebates today. See how →
Rebate software used to be something you operate. Glass does the work.
The last generation of rebate tools was software you log into: you run the report, export to a spreadsheet, and hunt the exception yourself. Glass, our AI agent, is a different category. You ask in plain language, and it reconciles the programs, finds the root cause across your systems and contracts, drafts the follow up, and shows its math on every line.
The old way
- Log in, run the report, export to a spreadsheet
- Build the pivot to get the answer you needed
- Chase the exception across tabs and inboxes
With Glass
- Ask the question in plain language
- Get the answer with the math behind it
- Teach it once, and it runs every week
Which buying group statements have not been reconciled this period?
Three statements are open. I matched each line against program terms, flagged the short pays with evidence, and prepared the claims for your review.
Alert me whenever an account is within three percent of its next tier.
Saved as a recurring skill. I will flag those accounts before the quarter closes so the backend money is not left on the table.
Both systems process the same data during your parallel run. The difference is what you can ask of it.
Where rebate work still falls back to spreadsheets
Statements reconciled by hand
Buying-group statements arrive as proof of payment, not proof of what was earned. Teams still match them line by line against program terms.
Re-keyed at every hop
Data moves from the ERP by hand, then out to spreadsheets for the analysis teams actually need. Every hop adds hours and error surface.
Contracts the system cannot model
Tiers, growth targets, billbacks, catch-weight, local marketing. When software cannot model the contract, the spreadsheet comes back.
Brand rebates get lost in redistributor volume
Invoice-vendor attribution credits the redistributor, and the brand program quietly loses the dollars.
Your own data, out of reach
In Speedy, everything you send and everything we compute is exportable, on demand.
Bring one program. We'll show the workflow.
Book a walkthrough →Speedy and TrackMax+, side by side
Both systems can track a rebate program. The difference to test is what happens on the messy work: statements, attribution, automation, and the math behind every number.
| Speedy | TrackMax+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Rebate program tracking, accruals, claims | Core | Core |
| Buying-group statement reconciliation down to source lines | Core workflow | Prove in demo |
| Redistributor, broker, and brand attribution | Core workflow | Prove in demo |
| Next-band opportunity alerts before the quarter closes | Core | Prove in demo |
| Rule-based workflow automation, no IT tickets | Rule engine, core | Prove in demo |
| AI agent that does the reconciliation work | Glass, core | Prove in demo |
| Your data and the math behind it, exportable on demand | Always | Ask in demo |
| Ingests your existing TrackMax+ daily file, no reformatting | Native |
Positioning guide only. Validate every workflow against your own program terms, files, and ERP flow.
The transition, de-risked
Nobody moves their rebate operation on faith. The path is built so your current process keeps running until the evidence says switch.
Same file, second destination
Speedy ingests the TrackMax+ flat file natively, record types A through J plus M adjustment records. Point your existing daily file job at our SFTP. No reformatting.
Programs imported, not rebuilt
Bulk import from your TrackMax+ program export. Nobody re-keys three hundred programs by hand.
Parallel run until the numbers match
Both systems process the same data while your team compares outputs. Speedy can emit TrackMax+ format claim files, so downstream GL importers keep working. Cutover happens when you say the numbers match, not before.
Frequently asked questions
Do we lose functionality we rely on today?
The parallel run exists to answer exactly that question with evidence. You keep your current process until your team verifies parity, and the walkthrough covers the capabilities your team gains: statement reconciliation, tier alerts, redistributor attribution, and the math behind every number.
Do we have to re-key our programs?
No. Programs bulk-import from your TrackMax+ export.
What happens to our GL and claims exports?
Speedy can emit claim files in the TrackMax+ format your downstream systems already import, so accounting workflows keep working through the transition.
How long does the transition take?
From data handoff, we run in parallel with your current process until your team agrees the numbers match. A complete transition guide is part of onboarding.
Evaluating other platforms? Speedy vs Enable·Speedy vs NetSuite